Running time?

The 2017 World War II thriller about the evacuation of British and Allied troops from Dunkirk beach.
Post Reply
Posts: 4
Joined: June 2012
I know Nolan pushed the running time of Interstellar to nearly the limit with the IMAX film reel. Should we expect another 170 minute movie or something a little more economical?

Posts: 224
Joined: January 2013
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Nolan himself has been saying 2 hours.

Posts: 2590
Joined: January 2016
Location: The Netherlands
I'm thinking around 130 minutes

Posts: 19674
Joined: June 2012
Yeah with credits likely

also, the film contains 100 IMAX shot minutes, which means the rest is 20 minutes 65mm, it's crazy

User avatar
Oku
Posts: 3319
Joined: May 2012
Averaging his last four films, then last three, then last two, gives 158, 164, and 167.

So I'll go with that. 158-167 minutes. :P

Posts: 1157
Joined: July 2013
Based on what he had said, I have a feeling this will have a shorter runtime than what we're used to from a Nolan flick, and that's exciting.

So, around 120-130 minutes is also what I would guess.

Posts: 13532
Joined: May 2010
Location: Mumbai
145 mins

Posts: 1070
Joined: November 2012
83 minutes.

Posts: 2590
Joined: January 2016
Location: The Netherlands
Didn't Nolan basically say it's about 2 hours long?

Posts: 1071
Joined: July 2011
Yep.
Fandango: So how, exactly, does Dunkirk push IMAX to the next level?

Christopher Nolan: Really, I think Dunkirk represents the culmination of all of these experiences we’ve had over the years [with IMAX]. How to work with that format, and how to really try to give the audience the most visceral experiential two hours that they can hope for.
I'm sure he's not being very precise in that statement, but I think the very nature of the story being about unrelenting tension warrants a shorter runtime than usual.

Post Reply