Page 10 of 10

Re: "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you"

Posted: May 20th, 2019, 9:34 am
by MuffinMcFluffin
kevlevrone wrote:
May 20th, 2019, 6:02 am
MuffinMcFluffin wrote:
May 17th, 2019, 8:49 am
kevlevrone wrote:
May 17th, 2019, 4:56 am
Hi everyone.
Hi kevlevrone.

Did I just hear an echo?
Hi Muffin. What do you mean by that?
If I have to explain it, then it's not funny.

Re: "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you"

Posted: May 20th, 2019, 1:33 pm
by Pratham
:lol:

Re: "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you"

Posted: September 13th, 2019, 5:05 pm
by Batfan175
Without this scene the third film does not happen because Talia specifically refers to Batman letting her father die as her reason for destroying Gotham City. In fact, every character who dies directly as a result of Batman breaking his one rule (Ra's al Ghul, Two-Face) has an impact on the third film in that their deaths make matters worse for the citizens of Gotham, which once again makes the case for Batman's rule not to kill his adversaries.